Interfacial Properties of Parrafin Oil  Alcohol Mixture in the Presence ff Glycolipids: Comparison of Interfacial Properties of Glycolipids with the Interfacial Properties of Brij 35P and SDS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The interfacial tension of water and a mixture containing paraffin oil, hexanol and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) was examined as a function of alcohol volume fractions. The interfacial tension aqueous glycolipid solutions, dodecyl glucose ester (obtained from SIRIM) and dodecyl glucose pyranoside, and paraffin oil-alcohol mixture was also examined and compared with the effect of aqueous solutions of Brij 35P and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) on the interfacial behaviors of paraffin-alcohol mixture. The droplet size of the mixture (oil light phase) was measured with the help of spinning drop tensiometer and the measurement of density difference between the heavy and light phases was determined using a densitometer. The interfacial tension between oil and alcohol phases gradually decreased with the increase in alcohol volume fractions, reaching a saturation interfacial tension value of 1.1 mN m⻹ at which the alcohol volume fraction reached 0.35. As far as effect of surfactant on interfacial tension is concerned, depending upon the oil to alcohol mixing ratio and type of surfactant used the interfacial tension that is being developed between the aqueous and oil phases decreased in a various degree. As opposed to other surfactants examined here Dodecyl-ß-D-Glucopyranoside (DOP) displayed exceptionally good surface activity, by being effective at all paraffin oil-alcohol mixing ratio. In its presence the interfacial tension of the equal volume fractions of these two liquids decreased from 1.2 mN m⻹ to 0.1 mN m⻹. On the contrary, SIRIM made glucose ester displayed good surface activity only at higher paraffin oil volume fractions, above 0.7. As far as optimal working volume fractions is concerned DGP, Brij 35P and SDS exhibited maximum surface activity at oil volume fractions from 0.5 to 0.70. These volume fractions corresponded to minimum interfacial tension between paraffin oil and IPA-hexanol mixture.The interfacial tension of water and a mixture containing paraffin oil, hexanol and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) was examined as a function of alcohol volume fractions. The interfacial tension aqueous glycolipid solutions, dodecyl glucose ester (obtained from SIRIM) and dodecyl glucose pyranoside, and paraffin oil-alcohol mixture was also examined and compared with the effect of aqueous solutions of Brij 35P and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) on the interfacial behaviors of paraffin-alcohol mixture. The droplet size of the mixture (oil light phase) was measured with the help of spinning drop tensiometer and the measurement of density difference between the heavy and light phases was determined using a densitometer. The interfacial tension between oil and alcohol phases gradually decreased with the increase in alcohol volume fractions, reaching a saturation interfacial tension value of 1.1 mN m⻹ at which the alcohol volume fraction reached 0.35. As far as effect of surfactant on interfacial tension is concerned, depending upon the oil to alcohol mixing ratio and type of surfactant used the interfacial tension that is being developed between the aqueous and oil phases decreased in a various degree. As opposed to other surfactants examined here Dodecyl-ß-D-Glucopyranoside (DOP) displayed exceptionally good surface activity, by being effective at all paraffin oil-alcohol mixing ratio. In its presence the interfacial tension of the equal volume fractions of these two liquids decreased from 1.2 mN m⻹ to 0.1 mN m⻹. On the contrary, SIRIM made glucose ester displayed good surface activity only at higher paraffin oil volume fractions, above 0.7. As far as optimal working volume fractions is concerned DGP, Brij 35P and SDS exhibited maximum surface activity at oil volume fractions from 0.5 to 0.70. These volume fractions corresponded to minimum interfacial tension between paraffin oil and IPA-hexanol mixture.The interfacial tension of water and a mixture containing paraffin oil, hexanol and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) was examined as a function of alcohol volume fractions. The interfacial tension aqueous glycolipid solutions, dodecyl glucose ester (obtained from SIRIM) and dodecyl glucose pyranoside, and paraffin oil-alcohol mixture was also examined and compared with the effect of aqueous solutions of Brij 35P and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) on the interfacial behaviors of paraffin-alcohol mixture. The droplet size of the mixture (oil light phase) was measured with the help of spinning drop tensiometer and the measurement of density difference between the heavy and light phases was determined using a densitometer. The interfacial tension between oil and alcohol phases gradually decreased with the increase in alcohol volume fractions, reaching a saturation interfacial tension value of 1.1 mN m⻹ at which the alcohol volume fraction reached 0.35. As far as effect of surfactant on interfacial tension is concerned, depending upon the oil to alcohol mixing ratio and type of surfactant used the interfacial tension that is being developed between the aqueous and oil phases decreased in a various degree. As opposed to other surfactants examined here Dodecyl-ß-D-Glucopyranoside (DOP) displayed exceptionally good surface activity, by being effective at all paraffin oil-alcohol mixing ratio. In its presence the interfacial tension of the equal volume fractions of these two liquids decreased from 1.2 mN m⻹ to 0.1 mN m⻹. On the contrary, SIRIM made glucose ester displayed good surface activity only at higher paraffin oil volume fractions, above 0.7. As far as optimal working volume fractions is concerned DGP, Brij 35P and SDS exhibited maximum surface activity at oil volume fractions from 0.5 to 0.70. These volume fractions corresponded to minimum interfacial tension between paraffin oil and IPA-hexanol mixture.The interfacial tension of water and a mixture containing paraffin oil, hexanol and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) was examined as a function of alcohol volume fractions. The interfacial tension aqueous glycolipid solutions, dodecyl glucose ester (obtained from SIRIM) and dodecyl glucose pyranoside, and paraffin oil-alcohol mixture was also examined and compared with the effect of aqueous solutions of Brij 35P and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) on the interfacial behaviors of paraffin-alcohol mixture. The droplet size of the mixture (oil light phase) was measured with the help of spinning drop tensiometer and the measurement of density difference between the heavy and light phases was determined using a densitometer. The interfacial tension between oil and alcohol phases gradually decreased with the increase in alcohol volume fractions, reaching a saturation interfacial tension value of 1.1 mN m⻹ at which the alcohol volume fraction reached 0.35. As far as effect of surfactant on interfacial tension is concerned, depending upon the oil to alcohol mixing ratio and type of surfactant used the interfacial tension that is being developed between the aqueous and oil phases decreased in a various degree. As opposed to other surfactants examined here Dodecyl-ß-D-Glucopyranoside (DOP) displayed exceptionally good surface activity, by being effective at all paraffin oil-alcohol mixing ratio. In its presence the interfacial tension of the equal volume fractions of these two liquids decreased from 1.2 mN m⻹ to 0.1 mN m⻹. On the contrary, SIRIM made glucose ester displayed good surface activity only at higher paraffin oil volume fractions, above 0.7. As far as optimal working volume fractions is concerned DGP, Brij 35P and SDS exhibited maximum surface activity at oil volume fractions from 0.5 to 0.70. These volume fractions corresponded to minimum interfacial tension between paraffin oil and IPA-hexanol mixture.The interfacial tension of water and a mixture containing paraffin oil, hexanol and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) was examined as a function of alcohol volume fractions. The interfacial tension aqueous glycolipid solutions, dodecyl glucose ester (obtained from SIRIM) and dodecyl glucose pyranoside, and paraffin oil-alcohol mixture was also examined and compared with the effect of aqueous solutions of Brij 35P and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) on the interfacial behaviors of paraffin-alcohol mixture. The droplet size of the mixture (oil light phase) was measured with the help of spinning drop tensiometer and the measurement of density difference between the heavy and light phases was determined using a densitometer. The interfacial tension between oil and alcohol phases gradually decreased with the increase in alcohol volume fractions, reaching a saturation interfacial tension value of 1.1 mN m⻹ at which the alcohol volume fraction reached 0.35. As far as effect of surfactant on interfacial tension is concerned, depending upon the oil to alcohol mixing ratio and type of surfactant used the interfacial tension that is being developed between the aqueous and oil phases decreased in a various degree. As opposed to other surfactants examined here Dodecyl-ß-D-Glucopyranoside (DOP) displayed exceptionally good surface activity, by being effective at all paraffin oil-alcohol mixing ratio. In its presence the interfacial tension of the equal volume fractions of these two liquids decreased from 1.2 mN m⻹ to 0.1 mN m⻹. On the contrary, SIRIM made glucose ester displayed good surface activity only at higher paraffin oil volume fractions, above 0.7. As far as optimal working volume fractions is concerned DGP, Brij 35P and SDS exhibited maximum surface activity at oil volume fractions from 0.5 to 0.70. These volume fractions corresponded to minimum interfacial tension between paraffin oil and IPA-hexanol mixture.The interfacial tension of water and a mixture containing paraffin oil, hexanol and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) was examined as a function of alcohol volume fractions. The interfacial tension aqueous glycolipid solutions, dodecyl glucose ester (obtained from SIRIM) and dodecyl glucose pyranoside, and paraffin oil-alcohol mixture was also examined and compared with the effect of aqueous solutions of Brij 35P and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) on the interfacial behaviors of paraffin-alcohol mixture. The droplet size of the mixture (oil light phase) was measured with the help of spinning drop tensiometer and the measurement of density difference between the heavy and light phases was determined using a densitometer. The interfacial tension between oil and alcohol phases gradually decreased with the increase in alcohol volume fractions, reaching a saturation interfacial tension value of 1.1 mN m⻹ at which the alcohol volume fraction reached 0.35. As far as effect of surfactant on interfacial tension is concerned, depending upon the oil to alcohol mixing ratio and type of surfactant used the interfacial tension that is being developed between the aqueous and oil phases decreased in a various degree. As opposed to other surfactants examined here Dodecyl-ß-D-Glucopyranoside (DOP) displayed exceptionally good surface activity, by being effective at all paraffin oil-alcohol mixing ratio. In its presence the interfacial tension of the equal volume fractions of these two liquids decreased from 1.2 mN m⻹ to 0.1 mN m⻹. On the contrary, SIRIM made glucose ester displayed good surface activity only at higher paraffin oil volume fractions, above 0.7. As far as optimal working volume fractions is concerned DGP, Brij 35P and SDS exhibited maximum surface activity at oil volume fractions from 0.5 to 0.70. These volume fractions corresponded to minimum interfacial tension between paraffin oil and IPA-hexanol mixture.The interfacial tension of water and a mixture containing paraffin oil, hexanol and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) was examined as a function of alcohol volume fractions. The interfacial tension aqueous glycolipid solutions, dodecyl glucose ester (obtained from SIRIM) and dodecyl glucose pyranoside, and paraffin oil-alcohol mixture was also examined and compared with the effect of aqueous solutions of Brij 35P and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) on the interfacial behaviors of paraffin-alcohol mixture. The droplet size of the mixture (oil light phase) was measured with the help of spinning drop tensiometer and the measurement of density difference between the heavy and light phases was determined using a densitometer. The interfacial tension between oil and alcohol phases gradually decreased with the increase in alcohol volume fractions, reaching a saturation interfacial tension value of 1.1 mN m⻹ at which the alcohol volume fraction reached 0.35. As far as effect of surfactant on interfacial tension is concerned, depending upon the oil to alcohol mixing ratio and type of surfactant used the interfacial tension that is being developed between the aqueous and oil phases decreased in a various degree. As opposed to other surfactants examined here Dodecyl-ß-D-Glucopyranoside (DOP) displayed exceptionally good surface activity, by being effective at all paraffin oil-alcohol mixing ratio. In its presence the interfacial tension of the equal volume fractions of these two liquids decreased from 1.2 mN m⻹ to 0.1 mN m⻹. On the contrary, SIRIM made glucose ester displayed good surface activity only at higher paraffin oil volume fractions, above 0.7. As far as optimal working volume fractions is concerned DGP, Brij 35P and SDS exhibited maximum surface activity at oil volume fractions from 0.5 to 0.70. These volume fractions corresponded to minimum interfacial tension between paraffin oil and IPA-hexanol mixture.
Downloads
Article Details
Transfer of Copyrights
- In the event of publication of the manuscript entitled [INSERT MANUSCRIPT TITLE AND REF NO.] in the Malaysian Journal of Science, I hereby transfer copyrights of the manuscript title, abstract and contents to the Malaysian Journal of Science and the Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publisher) for the full legal term of copyright and any renewals thereof throughout the world in any format, and any media for communication.
Conditions of Publication
- I hereby state that this manuscript to be published is an original work, unpublished in any form prior and I have obtained the necessary permission for the reproduction (or am the owner) of any images, illustrations, tables, charts, figures, maps, photographs and other visual materials of whom the copyrights is owned by a third party.
- This manuscript contains no statements that are contradictory to the relevant local and international laws or that infringes on the rights of others.
- I agree to indemnify the Malaysian Journal of Science and the Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publisher) in the event of any claims that arise in regards to the above conditions and assume full liability on the published manuscript.
Reviewer’s Responsibilities
- Reviewers must treat the manuscripts received for reviewing process as confidential. It must not be shown or discussed with others without the authorization from the editor of MJS.
- Reviewers assigned must not have conflicts of interest with respect to the original work, the authors of the article or the research funding.
- Reviewers should judge or evaluate the manuscripts objective as possible. The feedback from the reviewers should be express clearly with supporting arguments.
- If the assigned reviewer considers themselves not able to complete the review of the manuscript, they must communicate with the editor, so that the manuscript could be sent to another suitable reviewer.
Copyright: Rights of the Author(s)
- Effective 2007, it will become the policy of the Malaysian Journal of Science (published by the Faculty of Science, University of Malaya) to obtain copyrights of all manuscripts published. This is to facilitate:
- Protection against copyright infringement of the manuscript through copyright breaches or piracy.
- Timely handling of reproduction requests from authorized third parties that are addressed directly to the Faculty of Science, University of Malaya.
- As the author, you may publish the fore-mentioned manuscript, whole or any part thereof, provided acknowledgement regarding copyright notice and reference to first publication in the Malaysian Journal of Science and Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publishers) are given. You may produce copies of your manuscript, whole or any part thereof, for teaching purposes or to be provided, on individual basis, to fellow researchers.
- You may include the fore-mentioned manuscript, whole or any part thereof, electronically on a secure network at your affiliated institution, provided acknowledgement regarding copyright notice and reference to first publication in the Malaysian Journal of Science and Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publishers) are given.
- You may include the fore-mentioned manuscript, whole or any part thereof, on the World Wide Web, provided acknowledgement regarding copyright notice and reference to first publication in the Malaysian Journal of Science and Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publishers) are given.
- In the event that your manuscript, whole or any part thereof, has been requested to be reproduced, for any purpose or in any form approved by the Malaysian Journal of Science and Faculty of Science, University of Malaya (as the publishers), you will be informed. It is requested that any changes to your contact details (especially e-mail addresses) are made known.
Copyright: Role and responsibility of the Author(s)
- In the event of the manuscript to be published in the Malaysian Journal of Science contains materials copyrighted to others prior, it is the responsibility of current author(s) to obtain written permission from the copyright owner or owners.
- This written permission should be submitted with the proof-copy of the manuscript to be published in the Malaysian Journal of Science